I would describe this course as a really 'technical' course for preparing prospective English teachers in utilizing IT in their teaching, even more technical than the three English Language Teaching Techniques courses. Every time, we produced concrete, visible products for the attained learning objective(s).
Throughout the course, I have produced various teaching products, which definitely demonstrate the advantages of IT over the traditional teaching approach, some of which as summarized below:
1) Thesaurus - which definitely helps students improve their variety of vocabulary in writing without spending money purchasing a solid thesaurus
2) Quizlet - which helps students revisit and revise important concepts online, and students will then not have the excuse of not revising because of losing teachers' printed-out materials
3) Hotpotatoes - which undoubtedly saves teachers time in formatting in Microsoft Word in the process of designing matching, word puzzle exercises, etc.
4) Photo Story 3 & Adobe Spark - which positively encourage students to speak English (either narrate their own stories or recreate other stories), and this supplements the deficiencies of students not speaking English inside classrooms, although communicative language teaching approach is being implemented
5) Screencast-o-matic & ActivelyLearn - which facilitates the implementation of flipped classroom, something which lots of teacher find it hard and time-consuming to do
6) Powtoon and Prezi - which serve effectively as presentation tools to arouse students' interest (and thus lengthen their attention span) in the 'Motivation' stage of a lesson
7) Kahoot! & Google Response - which make instant response from students to teachers possible, and this defeat the blame from the English panel chair and/or principal that 'my teaching is one-way and too much teacher-talk'
I have seen lots of schools putting something very broad and vague like 'strengthen students' learning by utilizing multiple teaching approach' into their schools' Areas of Concern (sadly, including my alma-mater). IT in education should have fallen into the multiple teaching approach, but they still refuse to incorporate this into their school-based curriculum.
As a typical attitude in Hong Kong, 'People say a lot. Then I see what they will do', our education context falls into this cliché. I hope I will be the one who can initiate the change to IT in education within my school.
Once again, thanks Dr. Paul SZE Man Man for teaching this course wholeheartedly and sagaciously.

Throughout the course, I have produced various teaching products, which definitely demonstrate the advantages of IT over the traditional teaching approach, some of which as summarized below:
1) Thesaurus - which definitely helps students improve their variety of vocabulary in writing without spending money purchasing a solid thesaurus
2) Quizlet - which helps students revisit and revise important concepts online, and students will then not have the excuse of not revising because of losing teachers' printed-out materials
3) Hotpotatoes - which undoubtedly saves teachers time in formatting in Microsoft Word in the process of designing matching, word puzzle exercises, etc.
4) Photo Story 3 & Adobe Spark - which positively encourage students to speak English (either narrate their own stories or recreate other stories), and this supplements the deficiencies of students not speaking English inside classrooms, although communicative language teaching approach is being implemented
5) Screencast-o-matic & ActivelyLearn - which facilitates the implementation of flipped classroom, something which lots of teacher find it hard and time-consuming to do
6) Powtoon and Prezi - which serve effectively as presentation tools to arouse students' interest (and thus lengthen their attention span) in the 'Motivation' stage of a lesson
7) Kahoot! & Google Response - which make instant response from students to teachers possible, and this defeat the blame from the English panel chair and/or principal that 'my teaching is one-way and too much teacher-talk'
I have seen lots of schools putting something very broad and vague like 'strengthen students' learning by utilizing multiple teaching approach' into their schools' Areas of Concern (sadly, including my alma-mater). IT in education should have fallen into the multiple teaching approach, but they still refuse to incorporate this into their school-based curriculum.
As a typical attitude in Hong Kong, 'People say a lot. Then I see what they will do', our education context falls into this cliché. I hope I will be the one who can initiate the change to IT in education within my school.
Once again, thanks Dr. Paul SZE Man Man for teaching this course wholeheartedly and sagaciously.











